I’ve held off commenting on last week’s revelation that the California State Supreme Court essentially mandated, in the spirit of equality, that marriage be made available to any couple of legal age that desires to share in the state-provided benefits that come from participating in that institution, until the dust settles (if indeed it does).
This made headlines on KSL and in the Deseret [Morning] News for days as they self-congratulated our state for having the foresight, in the spirit of exclusion and elitism, to amend the constitution to not only not allow “gay marriage” in Utah, but to prohibit anyone married in another state from being recognized as such in our bastion of righteousness.
In spite of this, there seemed to be a palpable, press-fueled fear that somehow this ruling would affect Utah’s sovereignty. It was actually humorous to watch as the talking heads used not-so-subtle scare tactics to foment fear and paranoia anew in this presidential election season.
I can’t wait for the fall-out to gradually infiltrate and eventually take over the discourse, superseding things the presidential candidates should be discussing, such as the war in Iraq, the price of fuel and food, global warming, the sub-prime mortgage “crisis” and the ongoing talk of whether we are or are not in a recession.
The ‘publicans will jump on this obfuscating wedge issue yet again, like a duck on a junebug. I don’t know if I can stand it again.
Oh Zion, dear Zion…